IBM Leads with Amount of Patents.

So If you're saying that there's a company who's fiscally irresponsible, the signs point to Microsoft. There aren't millions of big blue's that IBM had to subsidise, but every single Xbox in American homes are subsidised. Just like the Auto Industry dug itself with subdising all of it's labor, and lack of integral innovation, Microsoft is diggin itself a hole including the Mobile O.S. being suspended from a winter release, Bing's failure, and MS 7's upcoming competition with Google Chrome. Not to mention Microsoft being found to have stolen MS. Office from a Canadian tech company last month in a Federal patent court. IBM is a serious player. Microsoft is and always will be a joke in the tech sector. Do you realise that IBM is currently a 130.00 per market share, and Microsoft is at 30. (Which is pretty much it's top share value in over a decade? Microsofts highest value was 60 (Only double of what it is today) and that was for a single month of Jan. 1999 When Y2k was at it's height. Microsoft is a dog without tricks. If anyone tries to claim the Xbox saga as profitable, you would be mistaken since they've subsidised its entire market.

Leading, Managing in the egalitarian Lions' Gate

When managers aren't prolific enough, then a "team leader" is a step below but pulls in the reins, so to speak. I will just add that this is similar to the reading's example of Toyota. How Toyota invests on R&D, and "Value Innovation Activity Program" In fast food chains the roles of managers and team leaders would strive to insist that every aspect of the customers experience is quality, and that is a valuable as well as sustainable mechanism.

My Proposition (Not Detailed, To Keep it prevocative like President's like to do)

the world is still flat in terms of my future enterprise. The ethical standards are inferior, andunfairly flat. The market is inferior, infertile. My product will effortlessly benefit people's lives; the majority of those people are still unaware of the flat and potential round world. When the environment that the flat world has produced is ignorance, our planet's left with a challenge of increasing people's intelligence in unity with their education. The Health Care world that allowed Health insurance Corporations be immune from anti-trust laws has been flat for 66 years, and only through grass roots movements have the momentum of revealing this true round nature been able to come peak at the 2 branches of governments offices these last 2 seasons. What my enterprise must do is all the same that the health care movement had to do. It's an organic concept so without corrupting it the assertive method is to build it via grass roots. Grass roots is the only answer for MY Enterprising career without conforming to the flat worlds perception. I have a non profit organization, we promote ourselves on multi medians. My girlfriend is currently the Art Liaison at the high school she's employed at. I'm experimenting at the farmer's market, and touching base and ethically operating with many other NPG's for our fundraising events and our sustainable programs as well. I am not making Fortune 500 salary to bank my project, so I'm left with no choice but to wait until I earn a bachelors degree in Sustainable business management to pick up the striving momentum for progress. If I don't do it, My universe, (Round worlds, flat worlds included) is lost.

The World is Flat; What would that mean to you?

To Me Flat word brings to my mind: Reservation, Oppression, Discrimination, inefficient, UN-integral, lack of conception, disregards composition, corruptible vision, Revolutionary because of fundamental and radical resonance among society YET Scientifically disproved.

Let me take it one step further. Pretend Email is the same as Flat World. The Round world is http://wave.google.com/help/wave/about.html